tl;dr

html SushiSwap is embroiled in controversy over proposed governance changes, sparking backlash from users and a former associate. The changes involve transferring assets to a new entity called "Sushi Labs" and redirecting future airdrops, raising concerns about community involvement and transparency...

html

SushiSwap is embroiled in controversy over proposed governance changes, sparking backlash from users and a former associate. The changes involve transferring assets to a new entity called "Sushi Labs" and redirecting future airdrops, raising concerns about community involvement and transparency. A former member has accused SushiSwap of a hostile takeover and criticized the head chef, Jared Grey, while an ongoing signal vote on the controversial governance proposal has seen 93% of participants voting "no." The rift between advocates for community involvement and supporters of the proposed changes intensifies, posing critical questions about the project's future.


The decentralized exchange (DEX) and automated market maker (AMM) protocol SushiSwap has been at the center of a significant controversy as users and a former associate express their opposition to proposed governance changes. The controversial proposal aims to transfer assets from the Decentralized Autonomous Organization (DAO)-controlled treasury to a new entity called “Sushi Labs,” while redirecting all future airdrops to the new body instead of the DAO. These developments have raised concerns about community involvement and transparency within SushiSwap.


SUSHISWAP FACES BACKLASH OVER PROPOSED CHANGES

The proposed governance changes put forward by the exchange request a grant of 25 million Sushi tokens to be awarded to Sushi Labs, including assets from various sources such as the Arbitrum (ARB) airdrop, business development, partner grants, Kanpai 2.0, Sushi 2.0, rewards, stablecoins, and “Sushi House” funds. Sushi Labs would become the sole beneficiary of future airdrops awarded to Sushi by protocols and partners. However, discrepancies have been noted regarding the wallet holdings mentioned in the proposal, which has led to further scrutiny.

Related Reading: Google Takes On Crypto Scammers With Legal Action


The Sushi DAO had previously approved a ballot window to establish a baseline legal entity structure. However, as the project’s needs evolve, the proposal’s proponents argue that updating the organizational structure is critical. They emphasize the importance of competent legal guidance to represent Sushi’s global presence effectively. The proposal also aims to empower Sushi Labs with full operational responsibility for core product development, seeking to streamline decision-making processes. Faced with these developments, Naïm Boubziz, a former member of SushiSwap, has accused the company of carrying out a real “hostile takeover.”


DECENTRALIZED GOVERNANCE UNDER SCRUTINY

In a series of damning social media posts, Naïm Boubziz has unleashed scathing criticism against SushiSwap’s head chef, Jared Grey. Boubziz accuses Jared of plotting to “kill the community” and the DAO while aiming to seize 100% of the treasury. Expressing disappointment, Boubziz claims to have issued warnings for months, but his concerns were ignored under “false pretenses.” Boubziz further alleges that snapshots were deleted without a proper reaction and accuses the community of turning a blind eye to the truth. Highlighting the claim of a “hostile takeover” previously made by Jared, Boubziz asserts that their actions were meant to prevent the very scenario that is currently unfolding.

Boubziz also argues that the current governance structure employed by SushiSwap requires updates and stresses the importance of community involvement. However, Boubziz further noted:

“… deep down you know exactly what is happening and what happened. The facts speak for themselves. It’s over for Sushiswap.”

These explosive accusations place SushiSwap at a critical crossroads as the governance proposal controversy deepens. The rift between those advocating for community involvement and supporters of the proposed changes has intensified, raising concerns about the project’s future.

Related Reading: Here’s How On Crypto Trader Turned $100 To $8.3 Million On An Ethereum L2 Network


So far, about 93% of participants have voted “no” in the ongoing signal vote on a controversial governance proposal for SushiSwap. Despite the overwhelming opposition, a second vote is scheduled for April 9th to determine whether the proposal will be implemented.


SushiSwap The daily chart shows SUSHI’s price trending downwards over the past month.

The exchange’s native token, SUSHI, is presently trading at $1.59, reflecting a continued downtrend over the past month with a decline of 12%. Featured image from Shutterstock, chart from TradingView.com

Disclaimer: The opinions expressed by the writers at Grow My Bag are their own and do not reflect the official stance of Grow My Bag. The content provided on our site is not intended as investment advice, and Grow My Bag is not an investment advisor. We do not endorse buying or selling any cryptocurrencies or digital assets mentioned in our articles. High-risk investments in Bitcoin, cryptocurrencies, and digital assets require thorough due diligence, and all transfers and trades made are at your own risk. Grow My Bag is not responsible for any potential losses and participates in affiliate marketing.

Disclaimer

The opinions expressed by the writers at Grow My Bag are their own and do not reflect the official stance of Grow My Bag. The content provided on our site is not intended as investment advice, and Grow My Bag is not an investment advisor. We do not endorse buying or selling any cryptocurrencies or digital assets mentioned in our articles. High-risk investments in Bitcoin, cryptocurrencies, and digital assets require thorough due diligence, and all transfers and trades made are at your own risk. Grow My Bag is not responsible for any potential losses and participates in affiliate marketing.
 22 Nov 24
 22 Nov 24
 22 Nov 24