tl;dr
Jiro, a developer at SushiSwap, has proposed a method to enhance operational efficiency, but skeptics have raised concerns about the proposal to centralize the protocol’s $53 million treasury, alleging voter manipulation by the core team. The proposal is winning with 62% of votes, with the official ...
Jiro, a developer at decentralized crypto exchange SushiSwap, has proposed a method to enhance operational efficiency and accelerate protocol development. However, skeptics have raised concerns about the proposal to centralize the protocol’s $53 million treasury, alleging voter manipulation by the core team. The proposal is winning with 62% of votes, with the official team's wallet being the largest voter, sparking concerns over the legitimacy of the vote. This proposal is the latest in a series of mistrust issues with the team at SushiSwap, including alleged censorship and the handling of an SEC subpoena. If passed, the proposal would allow a centralized team to directly control funds, raising ethical and governance questions within the community.
Jiro, a developer at decentralized crypto exchange SushiSwap, has proposed a method “to enhance operational efficiency and accelerate protocol development.” However, with less than a day left to vote, skeptics have been vocal on X in expressing concerns about a move that would centralize the protocol’s $53 million treasury. Some users have even alleged voter manipulation. “The leadership team has been laying the groundwork for several months to reach this pivotal moment,” former SushiSwap contributor B.Naïm told Decrypt. “I am both concerned and unsurprised.” B.Naïm has been vocal on Twitter since the proposal was put forward, creating multiple threads claiming that the core team are trying to manipulate the vote. The SushiSwap core team did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Decrypt. Put simply, B.Naïm claims that the SushiSwap team added liquidity to freshly created wallets moments before the next snapshot was created to increase the core team’s voting power. By doing so, he posits they wanted to give themselves more influence on the final tally. Soon after the proposals were listed and the voting snapshots were taken, the team withdrew the liquidity from the new wallets. “How can so many addresses be funded 10 minutes before the creation of the vote and then removed minutes after?” B.Naïm said, “Does that seem normal to you?”
When putting forward the proposal, both the “signal” and “implementation” proposals were designed at the same time. In really simple terms, a proposal asking permission usually needs to pass before one describing its implementation gets drafted. For both to appear at the same time has been flagged as an unusual move which, to the Sushi community, shows that the core team are confident their vote will pass. It also prevents community members from buying more voting power to block the implementation proposal.
At the time of writing, the proposal is winning with 62% of votes. This proposal is the first time the official Sushiswap team address, Sushigov.eth, has ever voted. The wallet has 5.5 million SUSHIPOWAH and another 3.1 million delegated to it from other community members—making it far and away the biggest voter. “The team assert that this was fully legal and condoned by their legal team.” Tom McClean, Senior Researcher at Vega Protocol, told Decrypt. “Whether ethically the community expected those tokens to be available to the team for use backing their own views on governance votes is another question," he added
Multiple Telegram and Discord messages show that the SushiSwap community did not expect the core team’s wallet would ever be used in governance. Other top voters include notable community members (voting no) and wallets included in B.Naïm’s threads (voting yes).
“In regards to if centralizing a treasury is bad, it’s a question of how much you trust the team,” McClean said. “If passed, the proposal would create a structure similar to what has been adopted for some other protocols, with a centralized ‘Labs’ team able to directly control funds however they see fit. Once given up by the DAO, such power is hard to claim back.”
This is the latest in a saga of mistrust with the team at SushiSwap, such as the handling of the SEC subpoena of Sushi Head Chef Jared Grey. This fractured relationship was compounded when the core team allegedly removed four snapshots, deleted the governance forum, and actively censored the Discord server.
“By removing the possibility of organizing new elections, etc., they will now be able to award themselves whatever salaries and bonuses they want,” B.Naïm suggested. “Even if Sushiswap stagnates, they will continue to comfortably hold their positions, without the possibility of demanding change.” The Sushi community is seemingly fighting an uphill battle and many are resigned to the fact that this proposal will go through—B.Naïm laughed at the idea of the proposal not passing. “In an
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed by the writers at Grow My Bag are their own and do not reflect the official stance of Grow My Bag. The content provided on our site is not intended as investment advice, and Grow My Bag is not an investment advisor. We do not endorse buying or selling any cryptocurrencies or digital assets mentioned in our articles. High-risk investments in Bitcoin, cryptocurrencies, and digital assets require thorough due diligence, and all transfers and trades made are at your own risk. Grow My Bag is not responsible for any potential losses and participates in affiliate marketing.