EddieJayonCrypto

 23 Apr 24

tl;dr

Ripple has filed its opposition to the SEC's motion for remedies and entry of final judgment, countering the agency's demand for nearly $2 billion in penalties with a proposed maximum fine of $10 million. The 186-page document details Ripple's compliance adjustments and argues against further puniti...

Ripple has filed its opposition to the SEC's motion for remedies and entry of final judgment, countering the agency's demand for nearly $2 billion in penalties with a proposed maximum fine of $10 million. The 186-page document details Ripple's compliance adjustments and argues against further punitive measures, citing proactive remedial measures to prevent future violations. Ripple contends that the SEC's demand for disgorgement is unwarranted due to the lack of demonstrated pecuniary harm to investors and argues for a significantly reduced civil penalty, citing legal precedents and disproportionality of the SEC's request. Reactions from the pro-XRP legal community reflect a belief in the strength of Ripple's arguments, with notable lawyers expressing confidence in Ripple's position.


In the XRP lawsuit, Ripple has filed its opposition to the US Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) motion for remedies and entry of final judgment. The fintech company counters the agency’s for nearly $2 billion in penalties with a proposed fine of just $10 million maximum. Filed late Monday, Ripple’s 186-page opposition document details its arguments against the SEC’s severe demands following a court ruling that found Ripple in violation of securities laws by selling XRP to institutional investors without proper registration.


RIPPLE VS. SEC: $10 MILLION OR $2 BILLION?

Ripple begins by acknowledging the violation, affirming its recognition of the court’s decision and detailing its compliance adjustments. “Ripple has publicly acknowledged that ruling, and does so again now. It has changed the way it sells XRP and changed its contracts to avoid the problems identified by this Court,” the document states. This acknowledgment is crucial as it sets the stage for the company’s argument that no further punitive measures, such as an injunction, are necessary. The company strongly opposes the SEC’s proposed injunction, arguing that it has already implemented significant changes to prevent future violations. A key passage from the document asserts, “The SEC fails to establish a reasonable likelihood of future violations.” This argument is built on the premise that Ripple’s proactive remedial measures effectively mitigate the risk of repeating the past missteps.


Addressing the SEC’s demand for disgorgement, the fintech company contends that the request is unwarranted because the SEC has not demonstrated that Ripple’s actions caused any pecuniary harm to investors. The opposition states, “The SEC fails to show that any disgorgement is warranted. Govil bars disgorgement because the SEC cannot show pecuniary harm.” This point is critical in Ripple’s defense, emphasizing the lack of direct financial damage to investors as a result of its actions.


Regarding civil penalties, Ripple argues for a significantly reduced amount, citing the disproportionality of the SEC’s request compared to penalties in similar cases. “ANY CIVIL PENALTY SHOULD NOT EXCEED $10 MILLION,” the document states, suggesting that such a figure is more in line with precedent and the nature of the violations.


REACTIONS FROM THE XRP LAWYER COMMUNITY

Reactions from the pro-XRP legal community reflect a belief in the strength of arguments. Bill Morgan, a notable pro-XRP lawyer, commented on the strength of Ripple’s position against disgorgement, “In summary, I think this argument is correct and disgorgement should not be awarded where it would give investors a windfall. Ripple looks in good shape for Torres to apply Govil and order no disgorgement.” Additionally, Jeremy Hogan argued via X, “The SEC has BIG legal problems to address if it wants to get a win against Ripple, and I still think it squandered its opportunity to get ahead with its first brief.” James “MetaLawMan” Murphy explained what to expect next. According to him, Judge Torres has not set a deadline for a decision. “But, I would expect that this decision will come substantially quicker than the summary judgment rulings. Best guess would be 60 to 90 days after the last brief (May 6).”


At press time, XRP traded at $0.54921, up 2.5% in the last 24 hours.

Featured image from Shutterstock, chart from TradingView.com

Disclaimer: The opinions expressed by the writers at Grow My Bag are their own and do not reflect the official stance of Grow My Bag. The content provided on our site is not intended as investment advice, and Grow My Bag is not an investment advisor. We do not endorse buying or selling any cryptocurrencies or digital assets mentioned in our articles. High-risk investments in Bitcoin, cryptocurrencies, and digital assets require thorough due diligence, and all transfers and trades made are at your own risk. Grow My Bag is not responsible for any potential losses and participates in affiliate marketing.

Disclaimer

The opinions expressed by the writers at Grow My Bag are their own and do not reflect the official stance of Grow My Bag. The content provided on our site is not intended as investment advice, and Grow My Bag is not an investment advisor. We do not endorse buying or selling any cryptocurrencies or digital assets mentioned in our articles. High-risk investments in Bitcoin, cryptocurrencies, and digital assets require thorough due diligence, and all transfers and trades made are at your own risk. Grow My Bag is not responsible for any potential losses and participates in affiliate marketing.
 27 Dec 24
 27 Dec 24
 27 Dec 24