tl;dr
Australia's financial crimes agency, Austrac, has ordered Binance Australia to undergo an external audit due to serious concerns about its anti-money laundering and terrorism financing controls. Austrac criticized Binance Australia's recent independent review as insufficient and highlighted issues i...
The long shadow of Binance’s past has reached the shores of Australia, as the nation’s financial crimes agency brought down the hammer on Friday, ordering the crypto giant’s local arm to submit to an external audit. Citing “serious concerns” with the exchange’s defenses against money laundering and terrorism financing, the move signals a new chapter in the global regulatory reckoning for the world’s largest digital asset platform.
The Australian Transaction Reports and Analysis Centre, known as Austrac, declared that its alarm bells were triggered by a cascade of troubling issues. The agency was particularly unimpressed with Binance Australia’s latest independent review, which it scathingly described as “limited in scope relative to its size, business offerings and risks.” The clock is now ticking, with Austrac giving the company just 28 days to put forward a list of potential auditors, from which the agency itself will make the final selection.
This is not a sudden development, but the culmination of mounting worries. Austrac detailed a litany of internal failures at the local unit, raising red flags about high staff turnover, a lack of local resourcing, and a concerning absence of senior management oversight. The findings paint a picture of a global behemoth potentially failing to meet its fundamental obligations on Australian soil.
Brendan Thomas, the chief executive officer of Austrac, delivered a pointed and public warning, aimed not just at Binance but at all global players operating in the country. “Big global operators may appear well resourced and positioned to meet complex regulatory requirements,” he said in a statement. “But if they don’t understand local money laundering and terrorism financing risks, they are failing to meet” their obligations.
This regulatory crackdown does not exist in a vacuum. It comes less than a year after Binance and its founder Changpeng Zhao pleaded guilty to sweeping anti-money laundering and sanctions violations in the United States, a landmark case that resulted in a staggering $4.3 billion settlement. The parallels are impossible to ignore, suggesting a potential pattern of compliance issues that stretches across jurisdictions.
Thomas hammered this point home, emphasizing the critical importance of localized expertise. “Understanding specific risks of criminality in the Australian context is crucial to ensure they’re meeting their reporting obligations here,” he said. The audit order is the latest salvo in Austrac’s broader war on the illicit activities that have plagued the crypto world.
In June, the agency imposed a A$5,000 limit on cash transactions at crypto ATMs, warning that the machines had become magnets for fraudsters and scammers. For Binance, which as of Friday had not responded to a request for comment, this forced audit represents a serious and unwelcome escalation in a market it cannot afford to lose.