
tl;dr
**Crypto Clash in South Korea: Regulation vs. Retail Demand**
South Korea’s financial regulator faces a high-stakes debate over the future of cryptocurrencies, as the country’s booming crypto market collides with government skepticism. At the center of the controversy is Lee Eok-won, the nominee ...
**Crypto Clash in South Korea: Regulation vs. Retail Demand**
South Korea’s financial regulator faces a high-stakes debate over the future of cryptocurrencies, as the country’s booming crypto market collides with government skepticism. At the center of the controversy is Lee Eok-won, the nominee to lead the Financial Services Commission (FSC), whose recent dismissal of digital assets as “lacking real value” has sparked fierce pushback from the blockchain industry.
**A Regulatory Cold Shoulder**
In his written testimony ahead of confirmation hearings, Lee argued that cryptocurrencies lack the intrinsic worth of traditional financial instruments like stocks or bank deposits. He warned that their extreme volatility makes them unsuitable as money, a store of value, or a medium of exchange. His stance aligns with South Korea’s current regulatory framework, which classifies digital assets as neither legal tender nor financial products.
Lee’s remarks also targeted pension funds, urging caution against their investment in crypto. However, he left the door slightly ajar for stablecoins, suggesting they could be regulated with safeguards to foster innovation.
**Industry Pushback: “Outdated Arguments”**
The crypto sector, however, is far from convinced. South Korea’s blockchain industry has grown rapidly, with crypto adoption soaring from 9.7 million investors in 2022 to over 16 million by early 2025—surpassing 30% of the population. Trading volumes on local exchanges have at times eclipsed those of the stock market, and total crypto holdings now exceed 102 trillion KRW ($70 billion).
Xangle, a local data firm, accused Lee of clinging to “outdated arguments” from traditional finance. Analysts pointed to recent developments like token buybacks and revenue streams from platforms such as Hyperliquid, Tron, and Ethena as evidence of value creation comparable to corporate stock buybacks.
**Retail Enthusiasm vs. Regulatory Caution**
Despite tightening rules, retail investors show no signs of cooling. In August, South Koreans sold hundreds of millions of dollars’ worth of Tesla stock—the largest disposal since early 2023—while channeling funds into crypto-linked assets like BitMINE, now the largest Ethereum holder.
Regulators, meanwhile, have doubled down on restrictions. The Financial Supervisory Service recently advised domestic asset managers to reduce holdings in crypto-related stocks, and the FSC ordered exchanges to halt lending services backed by digital assets or fiat deposits.
**A Nation at a Crossroads**
The clash between regulators and investors raises a pressing question: How will President Lee Jae-myung’s administration balance caution with the public’s growing appetite for digital assets?
As South Korea’s crypto market continues to expand, the debate over its role in the economy—and whether it’s a speculative bubble or a legitimate innovation—remains unresolved. For now, the country’s financial future hinges on whether regulators can reconcile their skepticism with the undeniable reality of a crypto-obsessed retail base.