
tl;dr
Singapore pushes crypto prudential rules to 2027 after banks and experts warned of risks to innovation and competitiveness, amid global regulatory shifts and pressure from hubs like the US and Hong Kong.
**Singapore Delays Crypto Prudential Rules to 2027 Amid Industry Concerns**
The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) has announced a one-year delay in implementing new prudential standards for cryptoassets, pushing the rollout to early 2027. Originally slated to take effect on January 1, 2026, the decision follows extensive industry feedback and concerns over the timing and treatment of blockchain assets.
### **Regulatory Adjustments and Risk-Based Framework**
The updated rules, aligned with Basel Committee standards, require banks to maintain capital reserves against their crypto exposures based on risk classifications. High-risk assets, such as those on public, permissionless blockchains, will face higher capital requirements, while stablecoins backed by eligible reserve assets may receive more favorable treatment. Extremely volatile cryptoassets could necessitate capital buffers of up to 1,250%.
MAS emphasized its commitment to balancing innovation with financial stability, stating it will "continue to monitor developments in the cryptoasset landscape and global regulatory standards to ensure alignment and support responsible innovation."
### **Singapore’s Crypto Landscape**
Singapore has long positioned itself as a hub for digital assets, introducing its first regulatory framework in 2020. While the city-state has limited retail participation to safeguard stability, it has fostered institutional adoption. Recent data highlights crypto’s growing footprint: 26% of Singaporeans held cryptocurrency as of April 2024, and web3 investments accounted for 64% of total fintech funding in 2024, totaling $742 million.
Local banks are also embracing blockchain innovation. DBS, for instance, launched tokenized structured notes on Ethereum, building on prior work with tokenized bonds. Other institutions are piloting asset tokenization and stablecoin integration.
### **Industry Pushback and Concerns**
The original 2026 timeline sparked concerns that Singapore would be among the first jurisdictions to adopt the Basel framework, potentially putting local banks at a regulatory disadvantage. Industry stakeholders, including Coinbase Singapore’s Country Director Hassan Ahmed, warned that the proposed risk classifications could unfairly penalize assets on permissionless blockchains, stifling innovation.
Ahmed noted that while MAS’s focus on user protection is commendable, the rules risk "overcapitalisation" and urged a reevaluation to ensure Singaporean institutions can "better and more fully participate in innovative technology."
### **Global Competition and Regulatory Shifts**
Ahmed also highlighted intensifying competition from other global hubs. With the U.S. enacting the GENIUS Act and jurisdictions like Hong Kong, the EU, and the UAE advancing crypto-friendly policies, Singapore faces pressure to refine its approach. Many markets are now adopting more inclusive rules to attract institutional participation, particularly in stablecoins.
### **Implications of the Delay**
The postponement provides Singapore with time to address industry feedback and align its framework with evolving global standards. However, it also underscores the challenges of regulating a rapidly changing sector. As MAS works to balance innovation and stability, the delay may offer a critical window to refine its approach while maintaining its position as a leader in the crypto space.
With crypto’s role in Singapore’s financial ecosystem growing, the revised timeline reflects a pragmatic effort to navigate the complexities of digital asset regulation in an increasingly competitive global landscape.